One Thought

Mike Turitzin's essays and articles

Just How Special Is an Elite Education?

7 comments

I attended Stanford University for five years, first as an undergraduate and then as a Master’s student. I say that only to establish credibility, not because I’m particularly proud of that fact. While my time at Stanford wasn’t miserable, it also wasn’t particularly happy. I was bothered the entire time by the vague feeling that something was wrong.

I ended up there mostly because of my competitive drive. I don’t remember thinking about college much before the age of 17. My parents went to college, and I assumed I would too. Beyond that, I was too busy making video games and hanging out with friends to care.

But at 17, I started caring — I think because that was around the time you started taking the SAT and hearing from the school’s college counselors. Suddenly college was a big deal. Everyone was talking about it, and I got sucked into the hysteria. It was too late to change my lifestyle in any dramatic way, but I do remember spending a lot of time studying for the SAT and strategizing for my college applications. It was a competitive thing.

So I got into Stanford. Hooray for me. I was a minor celebrity at my high school, which doesn’t often place students in top colleges, for a few months.

Have I benefitted from my (so-called) elite education? In some sense, yes. I got a well-paying job out of school that I surely wouldn’t have gotten without the degree. But I left that job a year ago; it wasn’t for me. And I’m not sure any of the jobs an elite education most advantages you for–ones in academia, the professions, and large corporations–are for me.

Sure, I learned a lot in school. But I’ve also learned a lot before and after. And the stuff I’ve learned outside of school has stuck with me the longest. There’s something about learning on your own that, at least for me, is infinitely more satisfying than learning in a class.

Here’s one thing I did learn at Stanford: As a rule, students and graduates of elite universities all agree on one thing: Their elite education is very important. They’re not elitists, per se — they may see themselves as privileged, and they may wish others had the same opportunities they did. They may even feel some guilt. But they do agree: An elite education is important. It’s a big deal.

But how important is an elite education, really? Just who cares if you have one?

Not as many people as you might think. It’s easy to forget that as a student–and often also as a graduate–of an elite university, you live in a bubble:

  1. While in school, you’re surrounded by other students who also value an elite education — they wouldn’t have applied in the first place otherwise, right?
  2. From the day you’re accepted till the day you graduate, you’re inundated with praise from administrators. Self-congratulation is always in the air. As an attendee, you are one of “the best and brightest.” You’re part of elite group of future leaders and world-changers. The future of civilization depends on you.
  3. You form some of your closest, longest-lasting friendships in college. Elite-university-goers tend to stick together long after they have graduated. They network, they meet friends-of-friends. Everyone within their circle believes strongly in the prestige and importance of an elite education.
  4. Elite universities are feeders for other institutions: the professions (law, medicine, etc.), academia, and large corporations. These institutions are filled with graduates from elite universities (and college graduates, in general). Within these institutions, the importance of an elite education is usually accepted as irrefutable fact.

Is it surprising self-congratulation is inescapable at elite universities? Not really. Administrators are telling students and their bill-paying parents what they want to hear. (These schools aren’t cheap, after all.) And administrators praise themselves by praising students — their own self-worth is also tied up in the prestige of the school.

Students like to hear that they’re special. After all, who doesn’t? But an elite education isn’t universally respected. Outside the bubble, many people will shrug their shoulders (or worse) when they learn you have one. And I don’t just mean “dumb” people — many smart people also have this reaction.

People tend to value things that make them look good. When we’re good at something, we place great importance in it, and when we’re bad, we think, “Who needs that crap, anyway?” This is what allows us all to be above average in our own minds.

It’s natural to value an elite education if you have one. And if you stay within the bubble, you’ll certainly have your belief corroborated. But an elite education isn’t without its drawbacks. Consider the following:

  1. At an elite university (or any college, for that matter), you spend four important years of your life in school learning rather than out in the world doing. That’s not necessarily a bad thing, but there are trade-offs: It’s hard to discover what you want in school, and depending on what you choose to do, you may be disadvantaged compared to people who were busy doing it while you were in school.
  2. If you’re like most people accepted to an elite university, you’re convinced at a very young age that you have, at least in some sense, made it. As a result, you start to believe you have something to lose. You become less accepting of failure. This can make you more risk-averse and conservative in your career choices.
  3. As a graduate of an elite university, you feel a strong urge–almost an obligation–to put your degree to use. It cost a lot of money and took a lot of work to get, after all. And since an elite education is a big deal (you think), you’d be throwing away a huge opportunity if you didn’t use it. This limits your career options — namely, to the ones an elite university degree most advantages you for. If you do anything else, you feel like you’re taking a step down.
  4. You’re trained at prestigious institutions to define yourself in terms of your association to them. And because you learn to take great pride in your institutional associations, you become accepting (and even needing) of their prestige and authority. Your personal identity becomes wrapped up in them. This makes it more difficult to live free of institutions: You may start to see them as the solution to your problems, seeking refuge in them to escape the uncertainties of the outside world.

Clearly these problems don’t apply to every student and graduate of elite universities. There are many exceptions. But the tendency is there — and if you live within the elite education bubble, it’s particularly easy to suffer from them without even noticing their effects.

An elite education isn’t all it’s cracked up to be. It’s good for some things and bad for others. Getting one certainly isn’t unequivocally a good idea — and it may be a bad one for many people.

Written by miketuritzin

August 7th, 2009 at 2:12 pm

Posted in Essays, Personal

7 Responses to 'Just How Special Is an Elite Education?'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Just How Special Is an Elite Education?'.

  1. You make some interesting points, but the majority of my friends from the elite institution you and I went to are not in the feeder industries you mention, or sometimes not even employed at all. Most of my friends are doing all sorts of cool and creative things, following their callings, being entrepreneurial, or back in school to study something very concrete. You might say that they’re doing this *despite* their elite degree, but I’m going to play devil’s advocate and put forth a hypothesis that the liberal arts education actually played a strong role in it.

    zuzf

    10 Aug 09 at 5:36 pm

  2. Thanks for your thoughts. Let’s see…

    First of all, I’m not talking about your friends; I’m talking about elite university grads in general. Certainly some groups will behave differently than others!

    Second, I didn’t mean to imply that you can’t do “cool and creative” things inside the elite institution bubble. Certainly you can, and many people do.

    Third, if someone is back in school, they are (generally) still within the bubble. Whether they’re studying something concrete or not is irrelevant.

    I agree that entrepreneurship is a big exception — particularly for Stanford grads — so good point there.

    I have no idea what kind of role liberal arts education plays in the life choices of most college grads, but I doubt personally that it has done much for me — after all, my education wasn’t very liberal-artsy in the first place!

    miketuritzin

    10 Aug 09 at 5:57 pm

  3. College in this country has become, for better or worse, so much more than an education. It’s really a whole lifestyle, a highly contrived and almost scripted ‘rite of passage.’ As you point out universities, especially smaller ones, go to great lengths not only to emphasize the values of their degrees but also to create a fictional sense of community (that nevertheless has efficacy because people believe in it). I was just at my fifth year college reunion and they handed out a list of everyone from my year who had donated to the school. About 1/3 of our class was on it, which I found astonishing. These working at their first jobs, or pursuing graduate degrees, or volunteering abroad etc, who still found it worthwhile to donate money not to some charity but their alma mater.

    You also rightly point out the way some people tend to get caught up not just in institutions but in a notion of career success that is not their own. In fact this may include the very notion of having a *career* itself. That there are stakes and consequences and dramatic life ‘meanings’ for everything we do which must fit into some largely pre-determined narrative. I guess I say this because I went to school with lots of creative but not particularly ambitious people who maybe now feel more of a pressure at times to be conventionally successful. And by the way, in this line of thinking, convention would also to expand to such things as callings, entrepreneurship, and school-studying both concrete and abstract.

    am

    12 Aug 09 at 1:19 am

  4. My main point was that if most people I know don’t fit the “elite grads in general” stereotype, something might be wrong with the stereotype.

    As for points about further education, I’m confused – do we not need people to study to be doctors and other kinds of specialists? Either way, I don’t think graduate school or lack thereof has much to do with your 4 main points, which I was disputing by the example of people around me that I see:

    (1) doing things that levergage their having gone to the elite institution (mostly through friend and professional networks)
    (2) taking risks
    (3) not putting their degrees to use
    (4) actually, I’m not sure I understood point 4. what does living free of the institution look like and what does being a slave to it look like?

    zuzf

    13 Aug 09 at 11:37 am

  5. Zuzka, I think you’re drastically misreading my original article.

    In no way do I mean to imply that it’s bad to work in the professions, work at a corporation, or stay in academia. You seem think I am saying that. I’m not.

    My point is that elite college grads, as a rule, have an overly lofty opinion of the importance of their education. An elite education is great for some things (see above) but not-so-great for others. (And the realm for which one is not-so-great is pretty vast.)

    The four points I listed (at the bottom) are meant as tendencies, not as unwavering laws of the universe. I, for example, have felt the pressure to put my degree to use. (I don’t necessarily mean in some very literal way, but at least to get a job that you’d get only with a degree.) Right now I’m not, but that doesn’t mean I haven’t felt that pressure. I suspect that the vast majority of elite college grads do. Do you doubt that?

    miketuritzin

    13 Aug 09 at 12:11 pm

  6. I definitely agree with “An elite education is great for some things (see above) but not-so-great for others.” My reaction has been mainly to generalizations, I tend to be suspicious of those.

    zuzf

    13 Aug 09 at 4:03 pm

  7. Fair enough. But it’s hard to say much about the world without making generalizations. That’s what we humans are good at — noticing patterns and using them to help us understand things :) (Almost) all generalizations will be wrong some of the time.

    miketuritzin

    13 Aug 09 at 4:08 pm

Leave a Reply